Comments on: Why You Gotta Ask “Why?”

by: bam

Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:01:23 +0000

Okay, I am now over the mullet and want to know more about the three men’s chests you are going to review that are shown on the right. Or are the actual books going to be reviewed

Hey, Nikki, each of those books will be reviewed. But dear god, I didn’t even notice the man-titty parade. WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME? That’s one man titty after the other.

by: Nikki

Sun, 28 Jan 2007 04:37:31 +0000

Okay, I am now over the mullet and want to know more about the three men’s chests you are going to review that are shown on the right. Or are the actual books going to be reviewed? or just the chests? or maybe just the men? Do these books qualify as Hot Cover of the Week candidates?

by: The Dean

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:36:47 +0000

From The Dean’s Desk:

My dears, it’s cover art, not a show at the Tate Modern. And what’s with the Tate Modern and the foam castle blocks on the first floor? Ah London, one of my favorite cities. Although strangely not where The Dean has had the best tea. But, back to the cover, it’s not a hidden road map to the interior of the story; it’s just the cover that some poor cover artist on a deadline with 16 other projects stacked up managed to get done based on the very little info supplied.

The Dean

by: Charlene

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:11:53 +0000

They had to do something with that hair. Either that or rename the book “Master of Swords, CPA”. But a mullet?

by: Jaimi

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:51:10 +0000

Nothing says, I can kill you in seconds like a “work up front and party in the back” haircut.

Wow, that sounded…homosexual. Cool.

I just pronounce sword with the w. I read too much as a child and didn’t speak these hard words until college. So, I mispronounce everything. Like adamant, wreak, wriggle, minute, etc. Oh well.

by: TheMistWalking

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:15:53 +0000

“They could put a piece of poo on her cover and I’d buy the book anyway.”

Hmm, how about Mr. Hankey. . . with a mullet? LOL.

Seriously, though, mullets = badness. It was a floofy hairstyle-gone-wrong 20 years ago, and it hasn’t aged for the better.

by: December Quinn

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:40:39 +0000

*shrugs*

The mullet is bad, yes indeedy. But the back is sexy, and c’mon, it’s Angela Knight. They could put a piece of poo on her cover and I’d buy the book anyway.

by: Jackie

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:20:17 +0000

I want to know what the tattoo is.

by: L.E. Bryce

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:02:44 +0000

Why does this cover make me think of He-man? Not a promising association for a romance novel, surely.

by: May

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:52:39 +0000

I have to consciously not pronounce the W too.

Someone should start an Anti-Mullet petition at Nationals.